The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GFMH · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
CCOI · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | GFMH | CCOI | VZ | TTGT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 49 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 29 | 55 (highest) | 47 | 50 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 81 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 30 | 90 (highest) | 40 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 0 | 21 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 24 | 41 | 42 |
| No price data | 191% above value if growth stopped today | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $486377 | $594M | $195.6B | $246M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |