The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

GIII · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

ODC · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RTX · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

HON · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

MeasureGIIIODCRTXHON
Moat Score (0–100)61 (highest)61 (highest)61 (highest)60
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend38—92 (highest)46
Pricing power593581 (highest)54
Returns on capital42584100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)736942
Capital allocation6377 (highest)5660
No price dataNo price dataNo price data105% above value if growth stopped today
Market capNot reportedNot reportedNot reported$131.9B
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2026FY2025FY2025