The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TXT · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GIII | TXT | RTX | HON |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 60 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 38 | 84 | 92 (highest) | 46 |
| Pricing power | 59 | 24 | 81 (highest) | 54 |
| Returns on capital | 42 | — | 4 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 78 | 69 | 42 |
| Capital allocation | 63 (highest) | 57 | 56 | 60 |
| No price data | 66% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 140% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $16.7B | Not reported | $154.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |