The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GLIBA · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
T · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BBGI · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GLIBA | T | SURG | BBGI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 36 | 52 (highest) | 46 | 48 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 0 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 6 | 18 (highest) | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 23 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 27 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 10% below high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $668.7M | $153.7B | $6.8M | $37.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |