The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

GOGO · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HWNI · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

LILA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SGA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureGOGOHWNILILASGA
Moat Score (0–100)33 (highest)33 (highest)33 (highest)32
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend55 (highest)333629
Pricing power27100 (highest)
Returns on capital52 (highest)08
Balance-sheet safety028055 (highest)
Capital allocation2444 (highest)2836
50% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price dataNo price data47% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$512M$163014$1.5B$54.6M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2024FY2025FY2025