The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OPY · Other · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SNFCA · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WLTH · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GPGI | OPY | SNFCA | WLTH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 | 63 (highest) | 60 | 58 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 59 | 20 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 85 | — | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 83 (highest) | 28 | — | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 100 (highest) | 48 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 64 | 72 (highest) | 44 |
| No price data | 46% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 65% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.2B | Not reported | $1.4B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |