The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FWRG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GPOX | GXXM | DCO | FWRG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 | 32 (highest) | 31 | 31 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 55 | 48 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 14 | 31 (highest) | 30 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 20 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 463% above value if growth stopped today | 257% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.7M | $138M | $2.5B | $750M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 |