The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KNX · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GPUS | KNX | RHNO | WRAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 46 | 57 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | 19 | — | 5 | 46 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 8 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 34 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 28 | 29 | 24 |
| No price data | 388% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $11.8B | $37.3M | $87.9M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |