The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GROW · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ACGP · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ILLR · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GROW | MIAX | ACGP | ILLR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 | 38 (highest) | 33 | 29 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 60 (highest) | 55 | 45 |
| Pricing power | — | 27 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 12 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 68 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 56 (highest) | 24 | 50 | 44 |
| 9% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $31.9M | $3.7B | Not reported | $209M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 |