The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GRPS · Agriculture · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
TULP · Agriculture · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GRPS | TULP | LOCL | AQB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 25 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 33 | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 6 (highest) | 0 | 4 |
| Returns on capital | — | 6 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | — | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 33 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $329048 | $6.2M | $23.6M | $3.5M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |