The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FANG · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GURE | RIG | FANG | IPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 30 | 60 (highest) | 50 | 52 |
| Pricing power | 53 (highest) | 44 | — | 5 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 18 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 46 | 28 | 32 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 59% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $4.9M | $6.1B | $55.7B | $424M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |