The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

GWRS · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FE · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

XIFR · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

OPTT · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureGWRSFEXIFROPTT
Moat Score (0–100)20 (highest)20 (highest)20 (highest)19
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5556 (highest)5525
Pricing power———0
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety00028 (highest)
Capital allocation24242444 (highest)
276% above value if growth stopped today136% above value if growth stopped today76% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$230M$26.7B$934M$139M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026