The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BIAF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HAS | BIAF | CHGG | FLYE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 33 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 57 (highest) | 15 | 21 |
| Pricing power | 95 (highest) | — | 91 | 47 |
| Returns on capital | 38 (highest) | 0 | 11 | 18 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 24 | 53 (highest) |
| 265% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 76% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $12.5B | $3M | $107M | $3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |