The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ODRS · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LAUR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | HCKT | ODRS | REBN | LAUR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 53 (highest) | 52 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 45 | 70 | 65 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 45 | 70 | 100 (highest) | 25 |
| Returns on capital | 97 (highest) | — | 0 | 15 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 57 | 28 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 27 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 96% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $7.8M | $5.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |