The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

HIGR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PHIN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DWAY · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ASTH · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureHIGRPHINDWAYASTH
Moat Score (0–100)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend10545055 (highest)
Pricing power484070 (highest)21
Returns on capital20063 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)37280
Capital allocation39404450 (highest)
No price data64% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data192% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$3M$3.0B$5.3M$2.0B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025