The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WLTH · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HKHC | WLTH | PGY | CLSK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 56 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 60 | 80 | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 43 | 100 (highest) | 57 | 63 |
| Returns on capital | 11 (highest) | — | 9 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 28 | 100 (highest) | 88 |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 44 | 44 | 44 |
| No price data | 87% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $380M | $1.6B | $1.4B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2028 |