The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

HLEO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CVEO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FFAI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RIVN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureHLEOCVEOFFAIRIVN
Moat Score (0–100)2425 (highest)2424
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend03470 (highest)
Pricing power26 (highest)1600
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety282555 (highest)28
Capital allocation4449 (highest)4224
No price data46% below value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$46.5M$396MNot reported$19.6B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025