The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GPC · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HLF | GPC | WEYS | DXPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 | 61 (highest) | 60 | 60 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 23 | 53 | 53 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 56 | 66 | 47 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 38 | 31 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 18 | — | 73 (highest) | 23 |
| Capital allocation | 59 | 35 | 72 | 98 (highest) |
| 59% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 67% above value if growth stopped today | 10% above value if growth stopped today | 218% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | $17.1B | $364M | $2.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |