The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HNIT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HNIT | PUBM | YYAI | WETH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 46 (highest) | 35 | 15 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 96 | 59 | 54 |
| Returns on capital | — | 30 | 18 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 42 | 44 | 60 (highest) | 0 |
| No price data | 98% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 83% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $445M | $589M | $165M | $15.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |