The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HOLO · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MTSI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | HOLO | MTSI | BLIN | NCNO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 55 | 43 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 67 | 79 | 88 | 98 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 18 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 72 (highest) | 55 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | 1404% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $19.9B | $14.4M | $1.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2022 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |