The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LVS · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HON | RTX | GIII | LVS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 60 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 46 | 92 (highest) | 38 | 80 |
| Pricing power | 54 | 81 (highest) | 59 | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 4 | 42 | 77 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 42 | 69 | 100 (highest) | 21 |
| Capital discipline | 60 | 56 | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 91% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data | 94% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $154.5B | Not reported | Not reported | $31.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |