The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HP · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OI · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HP | OI | CRC | IE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 28 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 36 | 48 | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 28 | 0 | 70 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 7 | 39 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 14 | — | 50 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 36 | 44 (highest) | 5 | 24 |
| 99% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 23% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.5B | Not reported | $4.7B | $1.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |