The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HPK · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GBR · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HPK | GBR | LWLG | WSTRF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 39 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 60 (highest) | 50 | 50 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 70 (highest) | 68 |
| Returns on capital | 54 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 30 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| 9% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $959M | $3.7M | $884M | $25.5M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |