The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TEAM · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HQI | TEAM | DSP | AGYS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 46 | 70 | 75 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 70 | 100 (highest) | 75 | 92 |
| Returns on capital | 56 (highest) | — | 21 | 13 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 36 | 55 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 654% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 873% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $53.2B | $845M | $3.0B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |