The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MNTN · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HUBB | EA | CSCO | MNTN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 78 | 79 (highest) | 79 (highest) | 78 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 97 (highest) | 66 | 69 | 70 |
| Pricing power | 48 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 97 |
| Returns on capital | 76 | 100 (highest) | 97 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 82 | 73 | 57 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 88 (highest) | 54 | 70 | 44 |
| 185% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 432% above value if growth stopped today | 220% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $23.8B | $52.5B | $432.1B | $186M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |