The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EDUC · Industrials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
UAL · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HUBG | EDUC | UAL | GNRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 66 | 10 | 85 (highest) | 36 |
| Pricing power | 17 | 96 (highest) | — | 60 |
| Returns on capital | 30 | — | 44 | 74 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 67 (highest) | 62 | 31 | 34 |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 42 | 48 | 55 |
| 100% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 50% below value if growth stopped today | 32% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3M | $12.3M | $38.3B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2024 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |