The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HUCK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
QMCI · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
UBER · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HUCK | QMCI | LAW | UBER |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 61 | 55 | 56 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 91 | 78 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 0 | 5 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 55 | 74 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 31% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 435% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $128M | $13.6M | $280M | $147.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |