The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HURN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
LVS · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HURN | HON | LVS | DAKT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 59 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 (highest) | 46 | 80 | 86 |
| Pricing power | 47 | 54 (highest) | — | 34 |
| Returns on capital | 11 | 100 (highest) | 77 | 18 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 68 | 42 | 21 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 82 (highest) | 60 | 63 | 56 |
| 89% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 140% above value if growth stopped today | 94% above value if growth stopped today | 1145% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.9B | $154.5B | $31.1B | $941M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |