The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HIVE · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CRSF · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SDEV · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HUT | HIVE | CRSF | SDEV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 | 44 (highest) | 42 | 41 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 (highest) | 50 | 39 | — |
| Pricing power | 71 | 3 | 79 | 84 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 9 (highest) | — | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 78 (highest) | 28 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $6.7B | $528M | $15M | $25.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |