The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GNK · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HY | JFB | GNK | MEDS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 24 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 14 | 50 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 17 (highest) | 2 | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 10 (highest) | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 33 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 27% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $68.7M | $1.2B | $321M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |