The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

IMKTA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BLPG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SCI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RRR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureIMKTABLPGSCIRRR
Moat Score (0–100)47 (highest)47 (highest)47 (highest)47 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend—534766 (highest)
Pricing power4364 (highest)38—
Returns on capital28—4452 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety56 (highest)2852
Capital allocation5944100 (highest)67
No price data90% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)87% above value if growth stopped today148% above value if growth stopped today
Market capNot reported$354756$11.3B$5.2B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2024FY2025FY2025