The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

INHD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CATO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SRI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FATAQ · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureINHDCATOSRIFATAQ
Moat Score (0–100)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend33223155 (highest)
Pricing power—48 (highest)26—
Returns on capital0414 (highest)5
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)282828
Capital allocation244043 (highest)24
No price data13601% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$53.2M$44.1M$162M$1725
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2024