The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

INOD · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

STWI · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DGII · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RPD · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureINODSTWIDGIIRPD
Moat Score (0–100)57 (highest)57 (highest)57 (highest)57 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend805092 (highest)75
Pricing power66100 (highest)81100 (highest)
Returns on capital14 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)555128
Capital allocation242460 (highest)24
No price dataNo price data328% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$1.8BNot reported$2.5B$625M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025