The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KROS · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | INSP | MIND | MOV | KROS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 70 | 31 | 72 |
| Pricing power | 99 (highest) | 44 | 91 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 | 53 (highest) | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 100 (highest) | 73 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 64 (highest) | 33 | 44 |
| No price data | 373% above value if growth stopped today | 74% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.4B | $50.4M | $826M | $197M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |