The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INSW · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | INSW | CR | RS | CAH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 48 | 26 | 83 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 63 (highest) | 51 | 14 |
| Returns on capital | 14 | 62 (highest) | 42 | 54 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 58 | 81 (highest) | 68 | 53 |
| Capital allocation | 80 | 18 | 85 (highest) | 66 |
| 26% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 191% above value if growth stopped today | 43% above value if growth stopped today | 406% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $5.4B | $11.9B | $21.3B | $59.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |