The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

INSW · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VTOL · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CRTD · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GRC · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureINSWVTOLCRTDGRC
Moat Score (0–100)51 (highest)51 (highest)51 (highest)51 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend5283 (highest)6383 (highest)
Pricing power70 (highest)41
Returns on capital141040 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety58 (highest)322830
Capital discipline80 (highest)80 (highest)4462
Price vs. high estimateAround the high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)118% above high estimateNo price data340% above high estimate
Market cap$4.4B$1.3B$200.7M$2.1B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2022FY2025