The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KWIK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | INTZ | KWIK | AAQL | SKKY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 44 | 45 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 44 | 57 | 43 | 62 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 87 | 70 | 80 | 97 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 12 (highest) | — | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) | 35 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 7200% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $15.1M | $3.1M | Not reported | $26.6M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |