The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

IPSI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

LVWR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

LCID · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DNUT · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureIPSILVWRLCIDDNUT
Moat Score (0–100)23 (highest)23 (highest)23 (highest)23 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend202065 (highest)40
Pricing power0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety2855 (highest)2828
Capital allocation44 (highest)422424
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$2.1M$298M$2.1B$540M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025