The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RGS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | IPW | RGS | PRTS | TITN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 40 | 22 | 53 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 51 | — | 52 (highest) | 28 |
| Returns on capital | 10 | 10 | 7 | 20 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 29 | 24 | 30 (highest) |
| No price data | 26% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | 28% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $65825 | $72.9M | $558M | $531M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |