The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
JAZZ · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ITGR | JAZZ | NKTR | ORMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 62 | 25 | 45 |
| Pricing power | 45 | — | 87 (highest) | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 3 | 28 (highest) | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 17 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 39 | 24 | 24 |
| 144% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.4B | $15.6B | $1.4B | $158M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |