The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
IVZ · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | IVZ | ORBS | PAPL | FWDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 19 | 21 (highest) | 20 | 18 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 21 | 32 (highest) | 27 | 10 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 0 | 20 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| 74% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $12.5B | $152M | $1.2M | $595M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |