The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UTI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BOTX · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | JACK | BLDR | UTI | BOTX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 38 | 15 | 95 (highest) | 85 |
| Pricing power | 76 (highest) | 39 | — | 39 |
| Returns on capital | 92 (highest) | 79 | 11 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 57 | 87 (highest) | 32 |
| Capital allocation | 64 | 82 (highest) | 24 | 60 |
| 80% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 55% below value if growth stopped today | 616% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $275M | $8.1B | $2.1B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |