The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OCC · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GNK · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | JFB | OCC | SMHI | GNK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 (highest) | — | 50 (highest) | 14 |
| Pricing power | 2 | 47 (highest) | 22 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 28 | 33 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 2035% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 33% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $86.6M | $106M | $221M | $1.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |