The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KLC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WOOF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
DUKR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KLC | AEVA | WOOF | DUKR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 27 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 60 (highest) | 41 | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 66 (highest) | 10 |
| Returns on capital | 33 (highest) | 0 | 5 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 1 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| 981% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 15% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $583M | $914M | $747M | $11.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |