The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DSFT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KLTR | DSFT | KLIC | CNXC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 20 | 20 | 55 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 98 (highest) | 88 | 74 | 62 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 41 (highest) | 34 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | — | 40 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 580% above value if growth stopped today | 71% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $198M | Not reported | $4.3B | $1.7B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |