The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KMX · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KMX | DLPN | DBGI | CVS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 21 | 22 (highest) | 21 | 21 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 65 (highest) | 34 | 52 |
| Pricing power | 18 | 0 | 20 | 37 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 0 | 14 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 6 | 0 | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 40 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 0 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 53% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data | 92% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $8.3B | $13.1M | $113M | $136.9B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |