The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KNX · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KNX | MTUS | BTOC | RHNO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 46 | 25 | 50 | 57 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 0 | 5 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 8 | 0 | 18 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 34 | 78 (highest) | 55 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 28 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 29 |
| 336% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $10.5B | Not reported | $129M | $63.5M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |