The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PUMP · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MXC · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KOP | PUMP | MXC | RCKY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 41 | 70 (highest) | 30 | 50 |
| Pricing power | 32 | — | — | 57 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 24 (highest) | 7 | 7 | 16 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 6 | 53 | 73 (highest) | 24 |
| Capital allocation | 88 (highest) | 24 | 43 | 42 |
| 18% above value if growth stopped today | 13344% above value if growth stopped today | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 33% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $977M | $1.2B | $18.7M | $303M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |