The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KPLT · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FLNC · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ADMQ · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: No debt, cash, or interest-expense disclosures to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KPLT | FLNC | ADMQ | BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 | 40 (highest) | 39 | 39 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 57 | 57 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 10 | 0 | 31 | 96 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 25 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 78 (highest) | — | 70 |
| Capital discipline | 60 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 5 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 97% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 80% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $33.2M | $1.9B | $6.5M | $5.2B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |