The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KROS · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EVFM · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KROS | AMPH | EVFM | ALKS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 56 | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 56 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 72 | 88 (highest) | 58 | 69 |
| Pricing power | — | 62 | 70 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 19 (highest) | — | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 32 | 55 | 73 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 83 (highest) | 44 | 27 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 58% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 219% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $207.4M | $896.0M | $1.0M | $8.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |